Minutes of the Regular
Meeting
Denali Borough Assembly
McKinley Village
Community Center
September 9, 2001
CALL
TO Presiding Officer
Jerry Mueller called the regular meeting to order at 3:47 ORDER p.m.
ROLL CALL Assembly members present were:
Sid Michaels, Jerry Mueller, Jim Caswell, Teresa Hall, Carol Shields, Teresa
Usibelli, Jim Payne, Scott Stowell, Gerald Pollock and Mayor Gonzales.
AGENDA The Chair entertained a
MOTION to approve the Agenda, HALL so MOVED, and PAYNE seconded.
MICHAELS stated that we should put all of the
tax ordinances together on the agenda.
USIBELLI suggested putting under K2.) Leadership and Civics class from
Tri-Valley High School on the agenda.
Chris Hagar, Denali Borough School District Superintendent, asked if the
redistricting ordinances could be moved to the beginning of the ordinances
section of the agenda due to the students needing to leave at 5:00 p.m. The ordinances were renumbered to group the
tax and redistricting ordinances together.
The agenda was approved by general consensus.
PLANNING 1.) DOT Park Road upgrade comments.
COMMISSION
Mayor Gonzales stated that this was brought to
him about a month ago. He stated that
there is about six miles of Park road near Kantishna that needs to be worked
on. Jerry Rafson told him about this
and that it is a doable project. Mayor
Gonzales stated that this will need to go on the Statewide Transportation
Improvement Program (STIP). He stated
that a resolution will be needed to be adopted in favor of this.
The chair entertained a MOTION for the Mayor to
proceed with a resolution in support of this project, STOWELL so MOVED and
PAYNE seconded. The VOTE was unanimous.
2.)
Request for a utility easement line across borough select land located
within section 6, T13S, R7W and Section 31, T12S, R7W, Fairbanks Meridian,
north of Healy.
Gail Pieknik, Land Use Technician, stated that
Brian Cook is requesting a utility easement located north of the old Healy
Roadhouse. Pieknik said that there are
two alternatives. She said that
alternative 1 goes across Borough select land and alternative two goes down the
section line.
STOWELL asked if this would provide power to
Borough land. Pieknik stated that it
would give us access for power.
MICHAELS asked if you would be able to still
build on the land. Pieknik stated that
you would not be able to build directly under the lines. MICHAELS asked if it was considered to go
from pole #87. Pieknik said these were
the only two alternatives brought to her.
Pieknik said that there will be a cost
difference in the alternatives.
Alternative 1 would cost $16,000 and alternative 2 would cost $14,150.
PAYNE stated from the take off at the parks
highway it looks to be no more than 100 ft.
USIBELLI asked if a person built on the joining
lot would it share the cost with Mr. Cook.
Pieknik stated that there would be a time limit.
PAYNE MOVED to approve alternative 1, HALL
seconded.
PAYNE asked if the land is of no value to
us. Pieknik stated that the land is
swamp and it would be hard to build on.
PAYNE call the question. The VOTE was unanimous.
3.)
Request from the State of Alaska, Janet Powers, and Wayne Calkins for a
driveway easement located north of June Creek on the Parks Highway.
Pieknik stated that Ms. Powers and Mr. Calkins
live south of June Creek. She stated
that they are currently parking in the DOT&PF pull off there at June
Creek. Pieknik said that they are
requesting a driveway.
MICHAELS MOVED to issue a letter of non
objection to DOT, and STOWELL seconded.
The VOTE was unanimous.
MINUTES 1.) August 12, 2001: work session, public hearing, and regular
meeting.
STOWELL read to the clerk a number of
grammatical errors to be corrected.
USIBELLI asked the clerk to research the motion
made regarding purchase of new equipment for the Cantwell Transfer Station.
MICHAELS MOVED to postpone until the October
meeting. CASWELL seconded. The VOTE was unanimous.
REPORTS 1.) Financial Report
The Chair entertained a MOTION to receive the
June 2001 financial report. HALL so
MOVED and SHIELDS seconded. The VOTE
was unanimous.
2.)
Mayor’s report.
The Mayor’s report was postponed until the
October meeting.
3.)
School District Superintendent’s Report
Chris Hagar, Denali Borough School District
Superintendent, stated that they are looking for a new business manager. He said that he has recommended Beth Sheen
to the School Board to be voted on later this week.
Hagar said that enrollment is down slightly this
year, 3 in Anderson and 2.5 in Healy.
Hagar said that they are still looking at better
communications in all directions between the School District and the
Borough. He said that they have been
talking about having a quarterly meeting between the Assembly and the School Board. He said that they are looking at sometime in
October.
STOWELL said that he noticed that there was a
raise given to some of the employees.
STOWELL asked how that could happen without asking the Assembly if they
could afford it. He requested that a
Borough Assembly member be present during contract negotiations. Hagar said the school district operates from
a budget that is approved by the Borough Assembly.
MICHAELS suggest that we have a work session and
that the School Board President and Assembly Presiding Officer figure out a
date.
USIBELLI said that she noticed on the bottom of
his report that this is his last year with the School District and she thanked
him for his time in the Denali Borough.
CASWELL stated that since the Borough has been
formed Hagar has tried harder than any other superintendent we have had to have
better communications with the Borough.
CASWELL commended him for it.
ASSEMBLY CASWELL said that the Park
Service has offered to come to the Assembly
COMMENTS and give the presentation that was
given to them on their trip into the Park.
He said that they did not see as much wildlife they were able to in past
trips. He stated that on the flight out
they were able to fly over the Stampede area.
He thanked the Park Service for the trip.
MICHAELS also thanked the Park Service for the
trip.
STOWELL encouraged everybody to go see the
Borough Clerk to get an application to run for office because you see things in
a different light when you are sitting on the Assembly.
RECESS The Chairman called a
recess at 4:31 p.m.
RECONVENED The Chairman called the meeting to
order at 4:45 p.m.
COMMUNICATION 1.)
Representative from the Department of Community and Economic
AND Development
regarding reapportionment.
APPEARANCES
Midge Clouse, Local Government Specialist, of
Department of Community and Business Development, handed out booklets
concerning reapportionment. She stated
that it is general information. She said that in Title 29 section .060(a) talks
about equal representation. She
explained the process of reapportionment and redistricting. She stated that there is a standard of a 10%
total variance set by the Department of Justice. She said that the Department of Justice will look to make sure
that the minority population is adequately represented.
Clouse stated that within two months after the
State’s final reapportionment plan is released, the Assembly has to decide if
it is malapportioned or not by resolution.
She stated that the Denali Borough had met that deadline.
PAYNE asked if they have adopted the State’s
final redistricting plan. Clouse stated that it is the final plan for
redistricting.
Clouse said that within 6 months, by February
12, 2002, the Assembly must have a plan and have brought it to the people for a
vote. Clouse stated that section .070
in Title 29 states “by the next regular election.” and section .080(e) states
within 6 months.
She stated that the commissioner has an
obligation to reapportion it for the Assembly if the Assembly does not meet the
6 month deadline. MICHAELS asked what
happens if we do come up with a plan and the voters vote it down. Clouse said that the Department would prefer
to give the Assembly time to go back to the drawing board and come up with
something else. Clouse said that they
strongly believe in maximum local control.
Eileen Armstrong, Healy resident, asked what
would happen if things went the other way and it gets voted in. Clouse explained that it would go for pre-clearance from the Department of
Justice, and 60 days after pre-clearance it goes into effect. Clouse said that if it does not get
pre-clearance then it would go back to the drawing board.
STOWELL asked if they can just come in and tell
us how we are redistricted. Clouse said
that she would recommend that the Department work with you. She said that we do not want to get to that
point.
CASWELL asked if after we are redistricted can
we go to the Census Bureau and have them draw their lines to match ours.
Linda Paganelli, Healy resident, asked how they
access the pre-clearance. Clouse said
that they will look at the census numbers.
She stated that there is a standard format and you have to justify
it.
Jenesy Jensen, Healy resident, asked why there
was not a map for the ordinance that has been introduced as there were for the
ones that have not been introduced yet.
Jensen also asked about voting at large. Clouse said that the Justice Department will look at how
minorities would be represented and if they would be able to get elected. PAYNE asked how you challenge the census
numbers? Clouse said that it would be
very difficult.
2.)
Leadership and Civics Class from Tri-Valley High School.
James Miner, Tri-Valley student, introduced the
class. He said that they are studying
redistricting in school and that they are here to hear about the
reapportionment.
ORDINANCES 1.)
Ordinance 01-09, Version A, an ordinance amending Article II, section
2.02 of the Denali Borough Charter regarding redistricting.
POLLOCK MOVED to amend the middle district from
6 seats to 5 seats and move that seat to the northern district. MICHAELS seconded.
CASWELL said that he would like to ask POLLOCK
to work with the staff to draw up a map on his proposal.
David Braun, Healy resident, said that it puts
the variance way out of the 10% allowable.
The VOTE to amend was unanimous.
MICHAELS MOVED to move the line “This ordinance
will go into effect as the existing seats become vacant.” in section 3 to the
last sentence in section 2 and have section 3 Effective date to read “This
ordinance becomes effective upon adoption of the Denali Borough Assembly,
signature of the Mayor, and approval by a majority vote at the next regular or
special election of the Denali Borough.”
STOWELL seconded. The VOTE was
unanimous.
POLLOCK MOVED to postpone, and MICHAELS seconded. The VOTE was unanimous.
2.) An
ordinance amending Article II, Section 2.02 of the Denali Borough Charter
concerning redistricting.
MICHAELS MOVED to introduce, and CASWELL
seconded. The roll call VOTE was 6-3
with CASWELL, HALL, SHIELDS, PAYNE, MICHAELS, and MUELLER in favor and
USIBELLI, POLLOCK, and STOWELL opposed.
This will be ordinance 01-12
PAYNE MOVED to postpone and MICHAELS
seconded. The VOTE was unanimous.
3.) An
ordinance amending Article II, Section 2.02 of the Denali Borough Charter
concerning redistricting.
CASWELL MOVED to introduce and HALL
seconded. The roll call VOTE was 6-3
with CASWELL, HALL, SHIELDS, PAYNE, MICHAELS, and MUELLER in favor and
USIBELLI, POLLOCK, and STOWELL opposed.
This will be ordinance 01-13.
PAYNE MOVED to postpone and MICHAELS
seconded. The VOTE was unanimous.
Rusty Lasell, Tri-Valley Volunteer Fire
Department Chief, stated that whatever options are out there, the Fire and EMS
lines should coincide with the proposal.
James Miner, Tri-Valley student, asked why we
can’t keep the districts line the same.
MUELLER explained.
MICHAELS said that the school board boundaries
do not have to be the same as the Assembly’s.
He stated that in the Borough Charter it states that you represent the
entire Borough not just your district.
USIBELLI said that the School Board should
mirror the Assembly. MICHAELS said that
we should keep it the same as the Assembly.
4.)
Ordinance 01-06, version E, an ordinance amending Denali Borough Code of
Ordinances, Chapter 24, Section 6, concerning management of Borough Real
property.
STOWELL MOVED to remove the last sentence of
section 6(a) “Easements will not be granted under a special land use permit.”
After discussion STOWELL withdrew his motion.
MICHAELS MOVED to postpone, and STOWELL
seconded. The VOTE was unanimous.
5.) Ordinance 01-08, Version A, an ordinance
confirming that the Denali Borough is and will continue to exercise solid waste
powers.
STOWELL MOVED to amend the title to read “the
Denali Borough shall continue to exercise solid waste power.” MICHAELS seconded. The VOTE was unanimous.
MICHAELS MOVED to include in the section 3.
Effective Date “and approval by a majority vote at the next regular election of
the Denali Borough.” STOWELL
seconded. The VOTE was unanimous.
MICHAELS MOVED to adopt and CASWELL
seconded. The roll call VOTE was
unanimous.
6.)
Ordinance 01-10, Version A, an ordinance amending the Denali Borough
Charter, Article XI, section 11.01, regarding an excursion tax.
STOWELL MOVED to amend by substitution the
ordinance on the agenda that he proposed.
PAYNE seconded.
CASWELL stated that it seems like it is quite a
change. STOWELL stated that it is
basically the same with the operations plan.
PAYNE stated that this gives us more to work
with.
Mayor Gonzales stated that over a year ago you
asked me to form a task force to research this issue. He stated that there is nothing wrong with STOWELL’s ordinance,
but the Assembly asked the task force to work on this and they did for over a
year. Mayor Gonzales stated that in
that year they came to the Assembly and told you what they have found and asked
to stay on and take it around to the public.
He stated that when they brought it to you in this form you told them
that you did not want all of that, you just wanted the ordinance and they went
back and did that. He stated that he
understands that it needs more explanation.
Mayor Gonzales said that amending by substitution would be doing the
task force a disservice. He asked how
he is suppose to get volunteers when you throw their work out.
STOWELL stated that all he did was take the
ordinance and roll it into this operating plan.
MICHAELS said that ordinance 01-10 basically
asks the people if they want this or not.
MICHAELS stated that STOWELL’s proposal is designed to go in the
Code. MICHAELS thinks that it will
cloud the issue. He stated that it is
getting the cart before the horse.
MICHAELS said that later we can figure out what forms we are going to
use and that sort of thing. He
suggested that the Assembly not substitute this.
STOWELL said that he disagrees. He stated that at the last meeting he heard
complaints about vagueness. He thinks
that it gives a better foundation for the public.
Lynn Boelsma, Healy resident, said that she does
not believe that the ordinances are the same.
She said that her business, a taxi service, was left out of 01-10 and is
in STOWELL’s substitution.
STOWELL stated that this is just a document to
get us started.
USIBELLI asked if any of the other tax
ordinances had been introduced.
STOWELL stated that this one is in it’s second
reading.
CASWELL called the question.
The roll call VOTE was 4-5 with STOWELL,
SHIELDS, PAYNE and MUELLER in favor, and CASWELL, USIBELLI, HALL, POLLOCK, and
MICHAELS opposed. The motion failed.
CASWELL said that he wanted to add on to
STOWELL’s history lesson from the work session. He stated that in the beginning of the formation of the Borough
it was believed that the tour industry can carry everything. CASWELL stated that when we need more money
he proposed to increase the bed tax from 4-6% and add a utility tax, that was
voted down. He stated that the people
wanted minimal government, taxes, etc. and if we wanted more we were going to
have to pay for it. CASWELL explained
about the capitol improvement projects (CIP).
He stated that the CIP for this year is more than the future CIP’s. He thinks that there would be enough money
without this tax, but if he is wrong it is because the State keeps increasing
the local match. He stated that he is
against the introduction of this ordinance.
He would support it, however, if we drop it to 2% and make it area wide. He said that everyone here should pay
something for their local government and schools.
MICHAELS MOVED to amend to replace the words
“Excursion Tax” with “Sales Tax”, and replace Section 2 starting at “There
shall be a (3%) excursion tax levied against...” and ending at “A.) Excursion
means any of the following:” with “Beginning January 1, 2003, a 3% sales tax
shall be levied against the following:”, and Section 2 after “13.) Golf
Course.” add 14.) Telephone, 15.) Electric Power, 16.) Heating Oil., and delete
“An owner of a business considered an excursion who contracts with a third
party...” HALL seconded.
PAYNE said that by adding telephone,
electricity, and heating oil you can drop it from 3% to 2%.
USIBELLI asked why MICHAELS did not put anything
in there about people selling tickets in Seattle for tours inside the
Borough. She also asked MICHAELS why he
did not put a sunset clause in the ordinance.
MICHAELS stated that in 1998 we lost the right to have our landfill
because of a sunset clause. He stated
that he thinks that they do not accomplish much.
CASWELL stated that 2% seems to be more than
enough.
Lynn Boelsma, Denali Citizen, asked how you
enforce the tax to businesses outside of the Denali Borough that still do
business in the Denali Borough.
MUELLER said that by we can only tax inside the
Denali Borough.
The roll call VOTE on MICHAELS amendment was 7-2
with CASWELL, HALL, POLLOCK, SHIELDS, PAYNE, MICHAELS, and MUELLER in favor and
USIBELLI and STOWELL opposed. The
motion passes.
CASWELL MOVED to amend the tax amount from 3% to
2%, MICHAELS seconded. The roll call
VOTE was unanimous.
MICHAELS MOVED to adopt.
MICHAELS withdrew his motion.
USIBELLI MOVED to add a sunset clause of 2
years, and STOWELL seconded.
MUELLER suggested that we review it in 2 years
instead of putting a sunset cause on it.
MICHAELS asked if the current CIP’s will go
up. Hagar said that they may be
adjusted at a 3% increase each year.
MICHAELS stated that a sunset clause is so final
and suggested adding language that the Assembly revisit.
MICHAELS MOVED to amend the amendment to review
it every 2 years, and HALL seconded.
CASWELL stated that review could mean rising the
tax.
Discussion ensued.
MICHAELS withdrew his motion and HALL withdrew
her second.
Steve Jones, McKinley Village resident, said
that he is in favor of the sunset clause but suggested making it 4 years. He stated that the Borough should be looking
at our land to make money.
Linda Peganelli, Healy resident, said that she
is in favor of the sunset clause.
David Talerico, Healy resident, said that he
supports the sunset clause.
USIBELLI MOVED to amend the amendment to a
sunset cause of 4 years, and HALL seconded.
HALL stated some day the people of this borough
might want to have road power, EMS powers, etc. that would cost money and we
would have to go through this all over again.
CASWELL stated that he is afraid of the tax
going up.
The roll call VOTE on the second amendment was
5-4 with USIBELLI, POLLOCK, STOWELL, SHIELDS, and MUELLER in favor and CASWELL,
HALL, PAYNE, and MICHAELS opposed. The
motion passes.
The roll call VOTE on the main amendment was 6-3
with USIBELLI, HALL, POLLOCK, STOWELL, SHIELDS, and MUELLER in favor and
CASWELL, PAYNE and MICHAELS opposed.
The motion passed.
STOWELL MOVED to take this to all four of the
communities, PAYNE seconded.
HALL said that there is no hurry, we do not have
to put it on the November ballot.
Eileen Armstrong, Task Force Chair, stated that
when it was taken to the communities by the Task Force, it did not include the
utility tax in the ordinance.
The roll call VOTE was unanimous.
The Chair entertained a MOTION to postpone until
the next meeting, STOWELL so MOVED, and PAYNE seconded. The VOTE was unanimous.
RECESS The Chairman called a
recess 6:50 p.m.
RECONVENED The Chairman called the meeting back
to order at 7:05 p.m.
7.) An
ordinance establishing a 2% general sales tax within the Denali Borough.
HALL MOVED to introduce, MICHAELS seconded.
HALL stated that there is two major differences
in the two ordinances. She stated that
hers doesn’t include utilities and there are a couple exemptions. HALL stated
that it is time that the local people start paying for their basic
services. She stated that she took the
amount of money given to all of the different entities each year by the Borough
and she used the number 2000 for the population of the Borough. HALL stated that for her small family of 3
people it cost the Borough about $1,000 for basic services.
STOWELL said that he could support this if
locals could pay a flat fee and get a tax exemption card.
MUELLER said that because we are not going put
this on the November ballot, we should bring this around to the four
communities as well.
CASWELL stated that it should be simply written
when it goes to the voters.
Steve Jones said that he likes this ordinance.
The roll call vote to introduce was unanimous.
The Chair entertained a MOTION to postpone until
the next meeting and STOWELL so MOVED and PAYNE seconded. The VOTE was unanimous.
7.) An
ordinance adding Title III, Chapter 22A, Titled Excursion Tax to the Denali
Borough Code of Ordinances.
STOWELL MOVED to put this on the work session
and regular meeting agenda for the October meeting. PAYNE seconded. The VOTE
was unanimous.
RESOLUTIONS 1.)
A resolution outlining the Denali Borough request for the capitol
matching grant program for Fiscal year 2003.
Mayor Gonzales explained there is a match but
the recipients have to pay that match.
He said that the State requires us to rank the projects.
The Chair entertained a MOTION to adopt, STOWELL
so MOVED and PAYNE seconded.
USIBELLI asked if there could be a priority
4. The Mayor explained. USIBELLI said that if we continue to support
the Chamber it would be putting money back into the business community.
USIBELLI MOVED to add a priority 4 for the
Chamber Building and take $1,667 from the other three priorities and add $5000
to priority 4. POLLOCK seconded.
STOWELL said that the cost of the Chamber
building is outrageous!!
The roll call VOTE on the amendment was 2-7,
USIBELLI and POLLOCK in favor and CASWELL, HALL, STOWELL, SHIELDS, PAYNE,
MICHAELS, and MUELLER opposed. The
motion fails.
The roll call VOTE to adopt was unanimous.
OTHER 1.) Update on petition regarding
reapportionment.
BUSINESS
The clerk stated that the handout was just an
FYI.
MICHAELS asked if the signatures had been
secured yet. The clerk stated that they
had not been secured.
PAYNE asked the clerk about the issue date and
getting it on the November ballot. The
clerk stated that the sponsor has been notified that if they would like to have
this on the November ballot they would need to get the signature to the office
two weeks before September 21, 2001.
2.)
Reapportionment issue.
There was no discussion.
PUBLIC Hagar complimented the
Assembly on the way they handled the meeting.
COMMENTS
ASSEMBLY PAYNE asked where we are with
the land that the school in Cantwell sits
COMMENTS on and AHTNA. MUELLER reminded PAYNE that this is Assembly
comment period.
USIBELLI asked if the administration was
planning to post the landfill position.
MUELLER stated that is a question, not an Assembly comment.
NEXT MEETING The next Assembly meeting will be held
at the Cantwell School on October 14, 2001.
ADJOURNMENT MUELLER declared the Regular meeting
adjourned at 7:26 p.m.
Attest: Approved:
Date
Approved: